International Sugar Journal 2006, VOL. 108. No.1289, page 247
to 253
|
|
White and Refined Sugar
Production from Cane Sugar Factories
Dr.
Chung Chi Chou, Principal Scientist, Dr. Chou Technologies,
Inc. USA
Drs. Khalid
Iqbal, Y. G. Min, D. W. Gao
and Emmanuel Duffaut, formerly
Research scientists/ Engineers, Sugar Processing Research
Institute, USA |
|
|
|
Introduction
Sugar from sugar cane is
extracted today much the same as it was 40 years ago. Sugar
extracted from sugar cane is processed to become raw sugar at
sugar mills and then further purified to refined white sugar
in a sugar refinery, using energy intensive processes.
However, sugar from beet is processed to refined white sugar
directly in a beet factory. Volumes of research have been
conducted on nature of colorants, polysaccharide and inorganic
profile of sugar process streams over the past thirty (30)
years. However very few research priority have been directed
to develop a sugar process that will produce the same quality
sugar at cane sugar factories that is currently provided at
sugar refineries at a significant reduction in energy
consumption.
Dr. Chung Chi Chou, while he
was the managing director of Sugar Processing Research
Institute (SPRI) during 1999 / 2000, organized and directed a
team to conduct a research project with the objective
specifically to produce white/refined sugar directly in sugar
factories. The team succeeded in their effort and developed
the “SAT” process to produce white sugar using clarified
juices from Sterling sugar factory in Louisiana. Both the
bench scale boiling pan at SPRI and pilot scale boiling pan at
Audubon Sugar Institute of Louisiana State University were
used for this study.
The “SAT” process involves the
addition of processing aids to clarified raw juice followed by
UF membrane filtration to produce refined quality sugar with
color ranging from 80 to 200 ICU. The sugar can further be
crystallized, using existing pans, to give a color of 10 to 20
ICU depending on customer requirement (1).
The SAT process
The following flow chart,
figure 1, describes the SAT process. A conventional raw sugar
mill clarifier is used to treat the mixed juice first. The
clarified juice is then subject to SAT process treatment as
follow: two processing aids are added separately to the
clarified juice with at least five minutes apart between the
additions to facilitate the reaction. The treated clarified
juice is then filtered through a cross flow UF membrane system
which produces at least 90% of permeate and a maximum of 10 %
retentate. The permeate fraction
is sent forward for evaporation. The
retentate fraction is further subject to secondary
clarification together with the under flow from the drum
filters to remove highly concentrated suspended matter and
macromolecules such as polysaccharides,
waxes
and gums etc. By clarifying the vacuum drum filtrate together
with
retentate and sending forward, the capacity of
the primary clarifier would increase by
about 15%. The clear effluent from the secondary clarifier can
either be sent forward for
evaporation or sent to the UF system for filtration. The
“scum” from the clarifier is
sent back to the drum filters for removal of suspended matter.
The two processing aids meet
the US regulatory requirements.
|
|

*Alternatively, a tubular membrane
system at higher capital costs
|
|
The SAT process is a “perfect” replacement
of carbonation and /or sulfitation
processes for production of plantation white sugar. Carbonation
involves an environmental issue for disposal of carbonate cake, particularly
for long term consideration. Sulfitation has been known for its serious
problems with respect to process instability, operational difficulties, low
sucrose yield due to high sucrose loss and poor product quality, including,
but not limited to, high SO2 contents and storage problems.
With the SAT process a raw sugar
mill can easily produce Very Low Color (VLC) sugar with color of 400 to 600
ICU and Ultra Low Color (ULC) sugar with color of 100 to 200 ICU. When VLC
“raw sugar” is shipped for further refining, A refinery can eliminate
affination and carbonation/ phosphatation processes. For ULC sugar, a
refinery can eliminate all the processes before pan boiling with considerable
operating cost saving. These advantages are illustrated in the following
figure 2.
The
illustration clearly shows that refined sugar can also easily produce
in a sugar mill by boiling ULC sugar one more time. As to be shown later in
this presentation, a raw sugar mill can produce about 30% of its product as
refined sugar without additional capital investment in boiling pans.
The SAT process will be perfect for a refinery
attached to a raw sugar mill. In fact, when a ULC sugar is produced by the
SAT process only some additional pans and drying equipment are needed to
produce 100 % of refined sugar in the attached refinery.
Integration of sugar mill with refinery operation
with SAT process (Figure 2)
|

|
Selection of a membrane
system for the SAT process
From technical and process
view point the pore size of membranes, based on molecular weight cut off
limit, is the most important factor to be considered. For the SAT process to
successfully remove sufficient fine particles, macro-molecules, such as
polysaccharides, dextrans, starches, gums, waxes, color and the complexes of
these constituents, the membrane selected should have a maximum molecular
weight cut off limit of 300,000. However, a molecular weight cut off limit of
75,000 to 100,000 is preferred.
For the design and
engineering of a membrane system, and most importantly for economic
justification, many factors need to be considered such as those listed in the
table below. The table is a text book case of a membrane project. For a given
objective/function of the project, four membrane vendors, after extensive
pilot testing, submitted the design as shown in the table. It should be noted
that power consumption varies as much as twofold and one system requires as
many as five heat exchangers for the same application. It is obvious that
each vendor has different types of membranes with diverse design criteria. It
is up to the user to select the best technically and economically justifiable
system for applications. It goes without saying that both operating and
capital cost greatly depend on the design and engineering of the system.
|
|

|
|
Principle, Experiments,
and Results
Factors
affecting the color of white/refined sugar includes: purity and color of pan
feed liquor, color types, polysaccharides, ash constituents, sugar crystal
size and distribution, and boiling time. SAT process is designed / developed
to reduce/minimize and improve or change these effect in order to produce
white/refined sugar.
Purity and color of feed liquor--The crystal sugar color is greatly affected by the
color and purity of pan feed liquor. Generally crystallization removes
between 90 to 96 % of color. The lower the color of feed liquor the better
the sugar color. Sugar refining processes use affination (mechanical
separation of color), carbonation, phosphatation, bone char, granular carbon
and ion exchange resin to remove color before sugar boiling (crystallization)
to produce white/refined sugar. Any or combination of above processes
selected should perform the highest net color removal with minimum
environmental problems. Unfortunately, except affination and crystallization,
all other processes create environmental issue.
The
UF membranes used in the SAT process remove color with minimal effect on
environmental quality as shown in the table below. The color removal ranges
from 48% for raw sugar to 58% for affination syrup. The ability of SAT to
remove color is essential to make white sugar from sugar mill. The maximum
color of clarified cane juice entering the SAT system should not exceed 12,000
ICU.
|
|
The above data also indicate
considerable improvement in purity due to non-sucrose removal by the SAT
process. The increase in purity is as high as four points for affination
syrup used in the study, most likely due to the presence of large quantity of
macro-molecules and well dispersed fine particulates. The increase in
clarified cane juice is expected to be less. The higher the purity of cane
juice the easier it is to make white sugar. For the SAT process the cane juice
should have a minimum purity of 85. Cane juice with low purity would contain
large percentage of invert sugar, which would not only create color but also
induce significant sucrose loss, particularly at low PH as practiced in
sulfitation processes for production of plantation white. The following data
evidences the tremendous sucrose loss due to sulfitation, up to 5%, due to
low PH and high invert in the cane juice.
% Sucrose loss at 80
°C, pH 5.0 of 65 brix
sucrose solution spiked with Fructose |
|

|
|
Color Types—To
produce white/refined sugar, in addition to lessen the color of feed liquor,
a survey of literature suggests a need for removal of colorants
preferentially occluded in the crystal. Donovan and his coworker have
concluded, in their study on preferential color occlusion in sugar crystal,
that the higher molecular weight colorants, which can be separated by
membrane, give much high color transfer into sugar crystal (2). Clarke and
her coworkers has proposed that polysaccharide is part of the very high
molecular weight color complex and is preferentially occluded in sugar
crystal (3). Removal of these high
molecular weight color and polysaccharide by a membrane system, which is part
of the SAT system, should facilitate production of white/refined sugar from
sugar mill. The following table shows the color and polysaccharide removal as
a function of membrane molecular weight cut off limits. It should be noted
that in general the % removal increase as the pore size of membrane decrease.
Chou also reported similar findings (4).
|
|
 |
|
Ash types—Carpenter reported (5) that ionic constituents in
sugar solution would greatly influence the degree of color adsorption by
adsorbents such as bone char and granular carbon. Colorants in a sugar
solution with excess polyanions (EPA) has much less tendency to be adsorbed
or picked up by adsorbents, particularly as the degree of conjugated double
bond decrease as shown in his data. He did not advance his explanation for
the phenomenon. Chou (4) advanced his reasoning in term of ionic strength of
the solution and the degree of conjugated double bond of the adsorbents.
Since the sugar crystal has no conjugated double bond, the
adsorption/occlusion of colorants into the crystal should be minimal as the
EPA is increased by addition of polyanions as processing aids. Some other
reasonings can be found in the literature (6, 7). In the SAT process,
polyanions are added as processing aids to increase EPA, and therefore
minimize color occlusion into sugar crystals.
|
|
Sugar crystal size and distribution— the sugar color,
for a given weight of sugar product, increases with surface area due to
the fact that about 15 to 30% of total color are on the outside of the
crystal. To minimize sugar color, the SAT process requires a minimum of
0.65mm average sugar crystal size (MA) and a maximum of 35 coefficient of
variation (CV) for its sugar products.
Boiling time--It is generally stated in the literature that ultrafiltration (UF.) treatment of sugar containing
solutions improves the crystallization rate during boiling and therefore will
subsequently increase vacuum pan capacities.
However, there is little specific data available in the literature on
the subject. Too many parameters
affect sugar boil, for instance, boiling schemes. The table below shows the increased rate of
crystal growth achieved with juice treatment by the SAT process.
|

|
|
The SAT process provides benefits, in addition to
color reduction, in the form of polysaccharide and other non-sucrose
impurities removal.
For example, the treatment of affination syrup using the SAT process removed
impurities as previously shown. It can be seen (see above table) that removal
of polysaccharides and other impurities, which affect the rate of crystallization,
did indeed improve the crystal growth rate by up to 49 %, 38 %, and 37 % for
the first hour, second hour, and third hour, respectively. The subsequent increase in crystal growth
rate will increase the factory/plant capacity, reduce sucrose loss, and
increase yield.
The increased crystal growth rate can be attributed
to a reduction in viscosity caused by the membrane ultrafiltration
along with processing aid treatment.
It is well known that treating juice with U.F. and processing aids
will give reduced viscosity. The table
below shows the reduction in viscosity up to 19% due to the SAT treatment.
Since the viscosity is difficult to measure at 85 brix, they were measured at
about 75 Brix. It is expected that
viscosity reduction would be significantly higher at 85 Brix, which is closer
to the actual conditions in sugar boiling.
|

|
|
Pilot plant testing-- In essence, The SAT process uses (a) the membrane
with right pore size to remove color, polysaccharide, and their complexes,
after addition of processing aids, in order to reduce both feed liquor color
and color transfer coefficient, and
(b) processing aids to increase EPA and to change the nature of
colorants in order to reduce occlusion of sugar color into sugar crystal.
The experiment involved five
scientists and engineers on three shifts/day basis for about two months. The
clarified juice were first treated with processing aids and membrane filtered
using a two gpm membrane pilot unit on site in Sterling Sugar Company of
Louisiana. The treated clarified juice was then evaporated to
65 brix using an pilot evaporator on loan from ASI of Louisiana University of
Louisiana (LSU). The concentrated syrup were then trucked to ASI of LSU and
boiled/ crystallized using a pilot vacuum pan with nominal capacity of twenty
gallons. The results are shown below. The data clearly indicate that white
sugar with color ranging from 80 to 200 ICU can be produced from cane sugar
factories.
White
sugar produced with SAT process
|

|
|
Benefits of the SAT process is shown in the
following list
1.
Sparkling sugar with color of 85 minimum
(ICU) meeting U. S. Food grade
standard
2.
SO2 less than 6 ppm
3.
Increase vacuum pan capacity by 30%
4.
Increase clarifier capacity by 15%
5.
Reduce evaporator scale by up to 75%
6.
Reduce sucrose loss by up to 2%
7.
Excellent stability in storage
8.
Up to 90% Dextran removal
9.
An automated process
10.
No conventional sulfitation/carbonation/
flotation process facilitating automation
of mills to reduce manning, and consistent high process efficiency and
products quality
11.
Ability to produce 30% of refined sugar
without additional vacuum pan
12.
Operate in conjunction with the Cti process to
produce white/refined sugar and value added sugarcane extract (antioxidant
etc.)
CONCLUSIONS
Reported here is a new sugar processing
method (SAT) providing an energy efficient and environmentally friendly
process for production of white/refined sugar from cane sugar factories. The
SAT process is a direct replacement of the sulfitation, carbonation, and
Blanco Directo processes for plantation white sugar productions.
The SAT process will: a) minimize color
occlusion into sugar crystal during sugar boiling producing sugar product with
color ranging from 80 to 200 ICU depending the need of the market ; b) reduce
scale formation in the evaporation process by up to 75%; c) increase pan
boiling capacity by 30%; d) increase primary clarifier capacity of 15 % by
elimination of vacuum drum filtrate recycle; e) reduce sucrose loss by up to
2%; f) reduce sulfate/sulfite content of the sugar; and g) improve the storage
stability of sugar products.
The crystallized ULC and VLC sugar
products from the SAT process in raw sugar mills/factories can be used as food
grade products for direct consumption as refined sugar, plantation white
sugar, and other low purity refined sugar.
Application of the SAT process in raw sugar mills in conjunction with a
sugar refinery can eliminate one or more of the various refining processes
such as affination, carbonation, phosphatation, and/or granular carbon/bone
char/ion exchange for decolorization.
In summary, the environmentally friendly
SAT process can produce high quality food grade sugar products meeting
customers’ needs with considerable savings in both capital and operating
costs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The
authors are grateful to Sterling Sugars, Inc. (Franklin,
LA) for facilities and
support provided for this study and to Audubon Sugar Institute of
Louisiana State
University for the use of its facilities.
The authors’ sincere appreciation are
extended to the Sugar Processing Research Institute (SPRI) group for
analytical support including Dr. Linda Andrews, Mary An Godshall, Ronnie
Triche, Sara Moore, Marie Kuebel, and Xavier Miranda.
REFERENCES
-
Chou, C. C. Sugar Processing- Where
are we going? International Sugar Journal, May 2001, pp 216-223
-
Donovan, M.; Williams, J. C. (1992).
The Factors Influencing the Transfer of Color to Sugar Crystals.
Proceedings of the 1992 Sugar Processing Research Conference, pp. 31-48.
-
Margaret A. Clarke, etc. ( 1992) .
Polysaccharide of beet and cane sugar: a progress report. Proceeding of
the Sugar Processing Research Conference, pp353-364
-
Chou, C. C. Process Development
Projects for the New Millennium, Proceeding of the Technical Meeting of
Sugar Industry Technologists, Inc. 2001. P 163.
-
Frank Carpenter, Bone Char Research
Projects, Technical Report No. 69.
-
Chou, C. C.; Rizzuto, A. E. (1972).
The Acidic Nature of Sugar Colorants. Proceedings of the 1972 Technical
Session on Cane Sugar Refining Research, pp. 8- 22.
-
Richard Riffer, Non-sugar and Sugar
refining, Chapter 36, pp627-660, “Handbook of Sugar Refining” by Chung
Chi Chou (2000)
-
Lionnet, G. R. E. (1987). Impurity
Transfer During A-Massecuite Boiling. Proceedings of the South African
Sugar Technologists Association, pp. 70-75.
-
Shore, M.; Broughton, N. W.; Dutton,
J. V.; Sissons, A. (1984). Factors Affecting White Sugar Color. Sugar
Technology Reviews, 12: 1-99
|
|
|